…But the social and political climate makes me look and sound like one. I believe the state has an important role to play in helping people to live their lives. Indeed, outside of things very personal to us (by which I mean family and the closest friends), I believe the state has the biggest role to play in our lives due to its universal spread and longevity. Almost anywhere I choose to live there will be a state present and we can harness this positively.
But the state doesn’t know best and it isn’t able to tell us how to live our lives. It is not possible for a universal beast like the state to dictate what is in the best interests of individuals. More potently, however, is that the state has no moral superiority to dictate that consenting adults, who aren’t harming anyone else, shouldn’t be allowed to do precisely as they please.
Two particular examples annoy me here in Poland (not to say the UK is great by any stretch of the imagination, but these rules don’t apply in the UK so they are noticeable to me). First is jaywalking. Here, you are not allowed to cross the road at your point of choice and, at a crossing, if the signal is red, you are prohibited from crossing. When I first came to Poland, I couldn’t get my head around the fact that when the road was empty, people wouldn’t cross – these traffic signals are surely there to help us, not restrain us? Seemingly not. What is worse is that the police (and “city guard”) actively look for people breaking this rule to hand out a fine.
Second is drinking in public. Now I don’t want to live in a society that has drunks on every street corner and it is almost impossible to walk to the shop without being threatened by drinkers. But, the law of prohibiting drinking in public is overly harsh. It needlessly stops people relaxing with a bottle of beer or wine in the evenings, at the park with friends. This is enforced equally with jaywalking. It’s as if the police have no crime to solve and Poland doesn’t have a national debt.
The basic premise is the state has no roll in how I treat myself. The state doesn’t know best.
So, I’ve read with interest the idea of further limiting cigarette advertising. Now, I think a time comes when a point is reached with cigarettes. If adults know the well-studied risks of smoking and still decide to start smoking, why should we stop them? Cigarettes aren’t a major cause of social problems (compare a guy going out for a couple of hours every evening to smoke 20 cigarettes to one drinking 20 pints in the same time). Doesn’t it ultimately get to a point where if adults want to harm themselves, we have to let them?










